Expert concludes bull shark killed Martin surfer
February 9th, 2010 by TCPalm.comBy James Kirley
It was likely a bull shark, not a tiger shark, that inflicted the fatal bite wound on kiteboarder Stephen Schafer last week south of Stuart Beach, a shark expert concluded after comparing his collection of jaws to autopsy photographs.
Biologist Grant Gilmore said bite scars on Schafer’s thigh showed different upper and lower jaws. This is characteristic of five species of local sharks. But only one species, the bull shark, would produce the bite pattern he saw in the photographs.
“This species (bull shark) is relatively common locally, as it enters the Indian River Lagoon to give birth each summer, enters freshwater tributaries throughout Florida and is encountered on nearshore reef formations,” said Gilmore, senior scientist for Estuarine, Coastal and Ocean Science in Vero Beach, “There is an artificial reef south of the attack site that is actually called the ‘Bull Shark Barge’ due to the frequency of bull shark occurrence at this location.”
Gilmore compared shark jaws with autopsy photos at the 19th Circuit Medical Examiner’s Office in Fort Pierce on Monday, under the supervision of Assistant Medical Examiner Dr. Linda O’Neil.
Twelve years ago, Gilmore identified the type of fish involved in the Treasure Coast’s only other fatal shark attack. He matched bite patterns on the remains of 9-year-old James Willie Tellasmon to that of a 6-foot tiger shark.
Gilmore has been in communication about last Wednesday’s attack with George Burgess, director of the University of Florida’s Program for Shark Research. On Thursday, Burgess visited the Medical Examiner’s Office and took photographs.
Burgess narrowed the suspect shark species to either a bull or tiger, but had to leave for a scientific conference in Hawaii before concluding his work.


Subscribe to TCoastTalk's RSS Feed

Browse the photo galleries here

March 10th, 2010 at 9:11 am
[...] Expert concludes bull shark killed Martin surfer | Treasure Coast Talk [...]
April 7th, 2011 at 5:36 pm
That could turn out to be a hobby! I don’t think that I have ever seen it stated quite like that but I get the idea. Speaking of hobbies, I generally spend a huge amount of time on the internet, mostly looking at the weather, talking in forums, checking the stock market, following world news, and stuff like that. I was looking at an article about this guy that I had already heard about named James Connelly. If you haven’t yet heard of James Connelly, it’s probably because he is more commonly known by his nickname, “The Penny Stock Prophet,” given to him by his peers due to his uncanny ability to discover “breakout” penny stocks just days before they experience RECORD gains. What Connelly is willing to share with the public, is how identifying the Psychological Support Level (PSL) of a given stock, is the key to his method being so successful. Psychological Support Level is nothing new in the trading world. It is the activity of human behavior that can cause a stock to be sold at well below its actual worth. After months of trial and error, tweaking and testing his strategy, Connelly was successful in creating what would eventually become one of the most popular and wildly successful stock picking strategies in recent memory. However, many people really wonder if it would be a good idea to dabble in stocks in a bad econonmy and when the stock markets are in such a flux. A recession in the “big” stock indexes is a positive factor in the Penny Stock Market due to the simple fact that when the big indexes aren’t doing well, many investors take a break from large cap stocks to focus on the micro cap sector (more commonly known as Penny Stocks). The bottom line is this isn’t for everyone and I recognize that. Not everyone is interested in trading Penny stocks on a weekly basis, but everyone is interested in making money. If you are at all interested, there is much more information at this link-> http://cash411.info/go/204/