The Palm Beach Post

Indian River County Administrator Baird not guilty of DUI

August 27th, 2009 by TCPalm.com

A six-member jury took only two hours to find Indian River County Administrator Joe Baird not guilty of DUI late Wednesday afternoon.

Baird, noticeably jubilant, sat with his attorney Bobby Guttridge as the court clerk read the verdict at 3:57 p.m. Baird then hugged his girlfriend and deferred comments to his attorney, before leaving the courthouse.

Guttridge said Baird is very relieved by the verdict.

“His reputation is still tarnished, but this goes a long way in vindicating him,” Guttridge said about Baird.

“Some people were angry that Baird took his case to trial,” but that’s the rights under the judicial system, he said.

Assistant State Attorney David Dodd said he respected the jury’s decision.

Baird plans to pay a speeding ticket issued in connection with the DUI arrest. He faced up to six months in jail and probation, 50 hours’ community service, a license suspension and fines up to $1,000 if convicted on the DUI charge. Because he refused a state-required Breathalyzer test following his arrest, the state suspended Baird’s driver’s license for one year.

The three-day trial, that included a day of jury selection, concluded with Guttridge contending police rushed to judgment and didn’t listen to Baird’s repeated contentions he had a problem with balance and coordination.

As the jury left the courtroom to begin deliberations, an alternate juror handed the judge a note suggesting one of the jurors may have been predisposed to making a decision.

County Judge David Morgan refused Guttridge’s request for a mistrial because of the note.

The handwritten note said the juror “told us that she was a friend of a woman who was excused as a juror (at the beginning of the trial) because her daughter was killed by a drunken driver. And that she (the current juror) in this case attended the child’s funeral.”

The final defense witness jurors heard was a man who bought a mixed alcoholic drink for Baird about a half hour before Baird’s arrest in Vero Beach at 10:26 p.m. May 16 on 21st Street.

Peter Armfield said he bought the drink just before Baird left the party shortly after 10 p.m.

A Vero Beach Police officer saw a spilled drink and ice on the floor of Baird’s Jeep after stopping him, according to testimony. But no tests were run on the spilled drink to find out whether it contained alcohol. And there was no testimony that Baird drank any of the cup of liquid Armfield gave him.

At the time of his arrest, Baird said he had had a few drinks earlier in the evening. Witnesses who attended the party said they saw him drink about two beers.

Prior to Armfield’s testimony, defense witnesses, including Baird’s girlfriend and his administrative assistant, testified that he has vertigo and has trouble balancing, which Baird’s attorney said contributed to his failing a roadside sobriety test conducted by Vero Beach Police following his being stopped on 21st Street

Baird’s longtime girlfriend, Karen Diegl, who lives with him, testified “He has a lack of balance on a daily basis. He cannot do any activity that requires balance.’’

He can run, ride a two-wheel bicycle, but he cannot put on shoes or pants while standing on one foot, she said.

Diegl’s testimony was corroborated by Baird’s administrative assistant, Dori Roy.

When Baird walks, he “lumbers one foot to the other,’’ she said. And, occasionally, when Baird gets up from a desk, he has to reach out and touch something, Roy said. “He almost seems to be working to get his balance.” She said she sees that several times a week.

Also, she was at the Youth Guidance fundraiser near Wabasso that Baird attended shortly before his arrest. She said she saw him shortly after 10 p.m., and “I didn’t feel like he was impaired. I didn’t think he had too much to drink.’’

Roy said that when she heard of his arrest for DUI, “I was shocked.’’

Other witnesses testifying Wednesday were people who were at the youth guidance fundraiser that Baird attended, and they said they saw no signs of Baird being impaired before driving to Vero Beach.

Guttridge said the roadside sobriety tests are abnormal tests of physical ability, requiring people to stand on one leg or walk a line. The tests “are ridiculous,” he said. And he told jurors police rushed to judgment and lied some in testimony.

Vero Beach Police Chief Donald Dappen couldn’t be reached for comment.

In closing arguments, Guttridge called on jurors to give Baird the benefit of the doubt.

“This man’s liberty and reputation are at stake,” he said.

Dodd told jurors that Baird’s contentions he has vertigo is just an excuse.

Baird refused a Breathalyzer test following his arrest. Dodd said Baird “should have begged to take the Breathalyzer test” to prove his innocence. He should have run to (the police department) to give that sample.”

Dodd also told jurors that witnesses who testified on Baird’s behalf lied.

“Every one of the defense witnesses had an interest in how this case comes out,” he said.

By Elliott Jones, TCPalm.com

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

4 Responses to “Indian River County Administrator Baird not guilty of DUI”

  1. fred Says:

    This guy could not count down from forty correctly,had a spilled drink inside the car, and could not walk straight on the video. Granted the one leg test does not prove anything except the fact that one can not do it- what about the evidence ? If one has been drinking the cops can smell that and observing driving they can see that. Doesn’t that count? This jury gave this guy a break. Don’t worry once you get one dui the odds of getting another are even greater than the first. Welcome to the system Mr.Baird

  2. Rules do not apply to me Says:

    Another case of someone thinking the rules don’t apply to them. He should resign or be fired for refusing to take the breathalyzer. It is a matter of character. He knows he is guilty. And everyone who lied for him should be held partially responsible when he does it again. Hopefully, it won’t be any of them or their relatives. Wouldn’t that be hilarious. Not.

    He refused to obey a law enforcement officer. Why aren’t their any repercussions for that? What a joke. If he were not ’such a wonderful person” doing work at a youth group and such, he would have been convicted. If he were not white–he would have definitely been convicted.

    Once again, the moral elite believe that the rules should only apply to the ‘other guy’ and not themselves. Poor guy wouldn’t drive drunk–he works with the church or youth group. But if someone doesn’t fit their version of a ‘good person’, then the vehemently go for the jugular. This duplicity is what is wrong with politics.

    Why don’t they release the video of his driving prior to the arrest and let us be the judge. Juries are a joke. Why? Because most of them are filled with the same elitist, arrogant, racists that are on most of them.

    Good day to all that facilitated this guys acquittal. His future actions are on you.

    BTW, why didn’t anyone have his doctor testify about a life-long issue with balance? Are his girlfriend or assistant medical experts? What their testimony to that affect or was it just people stating what they believe?

    Finally, everyone out there that wants to get away with drunk driving in Indian River County, just refuse to take the breathalyzer and have some friends lie on your behalf. It doesn’t hurt to have a relative on the jury either. Oh that’s right–they are all related. Welcome to the Indian River judical system–where it’s all about who you are, and not what you did.

  3. Rules do not apply to me Says:

    Wow. I just saw the DUI Field Sobriety Test dashcam video. That guy was so drunk it is criminal that his cronies and inbred jury have no moral backbone to do what’s right. He couldn’t count, he couldn’t follow directions, he couldn’t judge time.

    I have been pulled over a few times in my lifetime. On one occassion, and only one, I blew a .16. I don’t drink much. I do what most of us do when we go out. We all drive drunk. I did before I blew the .16. I was at least able to follow the pen without moving my head. I was able to count down from 44 to whatever (and I’m not good with numbers, lol). I was able to do fairly well with walking the straight line, which is difficult for most people, but still possible. I was able to touch my nose with my finger and ‘withdraw my finger from my nose immediately after touching my nose’. I was able to do all those things and still blew a .16. That’s double the legal limit nearly everywhere.

    I was arrested for DUI that night, and in hindsight, it was the best thing to ever happen to me because I will never do it again. I will never let my friends do it. I will never let anyone I am near do it. I learned my lesson. But what lessen did Mr. Baird learn? That he can get people to lie for him? That he shouldn’t be held accountable for his actions? That he can get away with anything, as long as he does work for the youth group?

    The entire process of deciding to drink impaired, getting arrested, going through the judicial system should be a learning experience. I fear you have taught Mr. Baird nothing of value–nothing that will benefit your community. In contrast, you have taugh Mr. Baird, indeed your entire community, that the rules they agreed to–don’t apply to everyone. Too bad you missed this learning opportunity. I hope the next one will not be over a child’s grave that Mr. Baird ran over the next time he drives drunk. As Fred states, there will be a next time. Always is. Mr Baird would have learned that fact in DUI class and counseling for his apparent drinking problem. Yes, I said a drinking problem. If you drive impaired, you have a drinking problem. Always remember, driving buzzed IS driving drunk.

  4. peggy Says:

    so by gutteridge saying the roadside tests are a joke does that mean no one has to abide by them now , i think mr baird got off way too easy , another case of its who you are and who you know ,lets hope he doesnt kill anyone next time , hope anyone that helped him by lying dont have to live with anyones death because of their actions

Leave a Reply

We'd like your thoughts on this story. I appreciate your willingness to share them. At PalmBeachPost.com, we want to avoid comments that are obscene, hateful, racist or otherwise inappropriate. If you post offensive comments, we will delete them as soon as we can. If you see such comments, please report them to us by clicking this link.

Tim Burke, Executive Editor, The Palm Beach Post.

News, weather, sports on PalmBeachPost.com
Video from the treasure coast

Want to chat about the Treasure Coast? Want to rant or rave? Visit Backyard Chatter.

Do you have photos you’ve taken that you want to share with other readers? If so, send them here and we’ll publish them online and in The Palm Beach Post’s Neighborhood Post section on Thursdays. Be sure to include who shot the photo, where it was shot, where you live and the names of everyone in the photo. Let’s see your photo skills! Photos Browse the photo galleries here.

Treasure Coast police blotters Keep track of crime in your area with Neighborhood Post's weekly roundup of arrests.


Your home for youth sports news in Palm Beach County and the Treasure Coast. Read the blog and share your comments!
Spotlight: This week's feature on local sports in the Treasure Coast
Archives
Martin County tax rolls